
Mobile home
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Core details are sourced from this business's Google Business Profile (checked 2026-09-16).
Residents consistently praise the leasing office and on-site management, particularly Luke Kelly and Lisa Evans, for professionalism and patience through move-in. However, serious maintenance failures undermine that goodwill. Multiple reviewers report weeks-long HVAC breakdowns during Texas heat, roach problems, electrical issues, and unresolved maintenance requests marked complete. After an electrical fire forced evacuation, management offered no temporary units or rent assistance for three weeks. Staff attention at the office level does not translate to reliable property upkeep or crisis management.
A small core of long-term residents express loyalty and praise the quiet atmosphere and updated units. Security has also earned recognition. But the stark split in ratings (41% five-star, 50% one/two-star) reflects deep inconsistency: excellent customer-facing staff cannot offset building maintenance failures that affect health and safety.
Recent shift: Mixed sentiment persists across multiple months. Earlier reviews (8-10 months ago) focused heavily on staff excellence; more recent reviews (7 months to 1 month ago) include major maintenance, pest, and emergency response complaints, suggesting system failures have worsened or become more visible.
Last verified 2026-09-16
As listed on Google.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Most residents praise the staff and peaceful setting, with maintenance supervisor Donnie consistently noted for quick repairs and the leasing team (Tarissa, Irving, Jessica) commended for professionalism. However, one lengthy complaint details months of unresolved issues: cracking balconies, broken appliances, AC failures, cigarette odors seeping in, a filthy pool, and non-functional security gates. The writer reports staff turnover among managers and feels maintenance cuts corners on repairs rather than fixing root causes. The split reflects genuine tension: 63% five-star ratings versus 23% one/two-star suggest either recent management improvements or that satisfied tenants outnumber those with serious problems. Affordability and quiet surroundings are real draws, but the detailed complaint raises red flags about deferred maintenance, safety oversight, and whether issues actually get resolved or just temporarily patched.

The Griffin earns praise for individual staff members-particularly a manager and maintenance workers Angel, Carlos, and Jose-who deliver professional, patient service when reached. However, a pattern of structural failures dominates the review picture: AC units break and stay broken for months despite repeated work orders that are closed without repair, units arrive filthy with mold, roaches, and leftover debris, the leasing office proves hard to contact and often closed during advertised hours, and applicants report deposits withheld after denial with no explanation. Several residents describe feeling trapped in unlivable conditions while management promises compensation that never materialises. The core issue is not individual incompetence but systemic: maintenance requests vanish from the system, communication tools fail (voicemail loops, emails ignored), and move-in inspections do not happen before lease signing. One reviewer waited two years for a functioning AC; others paid their own money for units or hotel stays to survive the heat. The business's own website promises on-site management and gated community safety, yet residents report rats, ants, and roaches throughout common areas and units. Trust is fractured when staff say repairs are complete but inspections reveal wiring errors and recurring failures.
Last updated 2026-09-16