Page 9 of 10: businesses ranked 801-900 of 925. Ranked by score and relevance, start from the top or open the full map view.
Lofts at Fairpark struggles with chronic management failures that overshadow its spacious loft layouts and Fair Park location. Tenants report months-long elevator outages, widespread roach infestations, water damage, and unresponsive staff who prioritize rent collection over repairs or tenant communication.
Shelby 2707 divides tenants sharply: half rate it excellent, half report serious problems. Long-standing issues include broken air conditioning during Texas summers, unanswered maintenance requests, and sparse office availability, though individual staff like Stephanie earn praise for their help. Reviewers warn that moving in involves confusion and staff absence, and repairs take weeks or months.
Kat receives praise for going above and beyond in customer service. Evidence is limited to a single five-star review.
Front-desk leasing staff, particularly Vanessa, earn consistent praise for professionalism and smooth move-ins. However, residents report that maintenance is slow and unresponsive. Recurring complaints include ceiling leaks, mold, plumbing failures, roaches, and months-long waits for repairs like stove fixes and shower knobs. Parking is chaotic and cars reportedly unsafe.
All five-star reviews describe a welcoming, clean community. Reviews are limited (three total, all from over nine years ago) and do not speak directly to luxury high-rise amenities or services.
Three reviews average 4.7 stars with no complaints logged. Limited detail available from review text alone.
Deep Ellum Living's rental management is marked by systemic failures that tenants report repeatedly: locked-out residents and broken security doors, evictions despite paid rent, and staff that ignore maintenance complaints until safety emergencies force action. A 1.3-star rating across 121 reviews reflects widespread frustration with unresponsive management, while former tenants describe discriminatory treatment, deposit disputes, and a maintenance team unable to influence policy despite tenant support.
One reviewer praised staff member Miya for professionalism and fraud prevention during leasing. They noted state-of-the-art units, underground parking, and proximity to downtown as standout features. Review evidence is limited to a single five-star account.
One reviewer who moved after 52 years of homeownership praised the spacious bright units, quiet setting, and welcoming staff. The community offers a pool and activities.
Mountain View scores 2.9 stars, well below the 3.79 category average, with 44% of reviews rating it one or two stars. Persistent complaints centre on crime (car break-ins, apartment theft), pest problems, and major maintenance failures, particularly AC outages during summer heat. Limited positive feedback suggests management responsiveness has improved for some residents, but safety and habitability concerns dominate the recent record.
Leasing experience here is highly inconsistent. One prospect waited 90 minutes after a scheduled tour was canceled without notice; staff ignored multiple calls and requests for follow-up. Another caller reported a condescending tone and dismissal of income-restricted unit inquiries. A third reviewer found staff helpful, but the pattern leans toward communication failures and unprofessional conduct during critical moments.
A polarized complex where two staff members, Anthony Robinson and David, earned strong praise for responsiveness; the location and all-bills-paid option drew repeat mention. Yet recent and earlier reviews document paper-thin walls, maintenance delays stretching weeks, a leasing team that ignored calls and emails, and persistent indoor air and cleanliness issues. Safety concerns and neighborhood conditions appear serious enough to deter many.
Five of seven reviews from the past year describe an absent or unreachable management office under Revival Property, with tenants reporting the building falling apart and staff ignoring requests. Two earlier residents praise the property's beauty and maintenance head Javier Rafael's responsiveness, but recent reviews paint a picture of deteriorating conditions and management neglect that contradicts those experiences.
Residents describe consistently poor experiences: maintenance requests languish for weeks or months without resolution, staff are dismissive and sometimes hostile when contacted, and paid pest control services fail to work. The handful of neutral comments offer little counterweight to complaints about unresponsiveness and disrespect from management.
Most residents report uncontrolled temperatures, slow or absent maintenance, and serious pest and mold issues. One staff member, De'Angelo, earned consistent praise for his responsiveness and attitude, but this did not resolve widespread facility and management problems that led many to call the property uninhabitable.
Evidence is limited to a single review citing rudeness at the leasing office. More data would be needed to assess the community fairly.
Most residents describe serious problems: prolonged water outages, deteriorating units from decades past, and unsafe grounds where theft and vandalism occur regularly. A handful of older reviews praise affordable rent and kind staff, but recent feedback centers on management conduct, billing disputes, and the complex' failure to address basic maintenance.
Despite low ratings, some residents report affordable pricing and responsive maintenance, but pervasive complaints center on persistent roach infestations, water and cooling system failures, and aggressive towing practices. The gap between positive and negative experiences suggests unit and tenant variability rather than consistent service.
Long-time residents recall excellent service and Rick's hands-on management, but recent reviews flag ownership and property management changes that have left grounds unmaintained, homeless encampments unmanaged, and tenant conflicts unresolved. Limited review evidence; two older five-star reviews contrast sharply with a detailed one-star account of deterioration since new ownership.
Residents celebrate a close-knit community near downtown Fort Worth's entertainment and cultural hubs. Long-term tenants report feeling safe and welcomed by staff like Josh and Victoria, though older construction means sound carries between units.
The Springs Apartments faced a major property closure and tenant eviction around 2022. Before that, reviews divided sharply: some praised responsive maintenance and kind staff, while others reported months-long elevator outages, water failures post-winter storm, and sudden fee hikes. Current operational status is unclear from reviews alone.
Limited review detail is available. Five-star and one/two-star reviews are split nearly evenly, suggesting mixed resident experiences. The few detailed comments mention pleasant finishes, though most reviews lack specific insight into maintenance, amenities, or management responsiveness.
Limited review evidence: one commenter praised the industrial apartment style, but a pet owner flagged breed restrictions. The 3.7-star average reflects mixed experience.
Experiences hinge sharply on when you moved in. Residents who encountered newer management praise fast maintenance and attentive office staff (Amparo and Liddy named). Earlier tenants faced roach infestations despite paying pest fees, water billing inconsistencies, and harassment from office staff. Safety breaches and vendor payment issues emerge in reports.
One reviewer praised security cameras, on-site management, and timely repairs under new ownership. Another reported a two-day power outage with no maintenance response. Evidence is thin due to limited reviews.
Whisperwind offers budget apartments in a quiet Arlington Heights neighborhood with a pool and low utility costs, but persistent maintenance failures and pest problems undermine the value. Recent reviews describe broken laundry facilities, poor drainage, roach infestations, and concerning conduct by on-site maintenance staff; older reviews suggest the property has deteriorated despite rent increases over the past decade.
Residents report severe pest infestations and maintenance neglect, with complaints going unresolved for months. The building has structural issues and recent upgrades are visibly cut-corner; staff have been described as unresponsive and rude. Location in Junius Heights is quiet, but living conditions fall well short of luxury standards.
Both reviewers gave five stars. One toured unit 103 and noted the generous layout. Review volume is limited, so this profile reflects initial impressions only.
One recent reviewer praised quick fixes and rent assistance, but seven of ten ratings are one or two stars. The core issues cluster around mold so severe it damaged belongings and caused health problems, utilities left non-functional without communication, and pest infestations. Management disputes appear to centre on whether serious conditions are acknowledged.
Review evidence is limited to a single 5-star rating. The business offers real estate brokerage, property management, and leasing services across the Dallas/Fort Worth area.
The apartment complex is rated 1.8/5 across 13 reviews, with 77% giving one or two stars. Residents report persistent plumbing failures, broken laundry facilities, and security problems including squatters. Management rarely responds to calls or opens the office during posted hours, and the property has cycled through multiple management companies. Earlier reviews mention staff friendliness and one management transition that seemed promising, but current feedback shows deterioration and unresolved maintenance issues dating years back.
One renter praised clean linens, but another reported a broken air conditioner left unfixed for nearly two months during a high-risk pregnancy, with management dismissive and unreachable. Evidence is thin with only three reviews.
Recent reviews paint a troubling picture of management failures and persistent maintenance lapses. Tenants report roach infestations, mold, broken washing machines left defunct for over a year, and scattered debris from recent construction. While older reviews praised friendly neighbors, current residents cite poor communication from Fowler Property Management and billing surprises after lease renewal.
Two recent five-star reviews praise clean interiors and helpful staff, but this conflicts sharply with five one-star reviews from prior years citing chronic roach infestation, months-long appliance outages, black mold, unresponsive management, and escalating safety issues. The gap suggests either major operational changes in the past two years or inconsistent service across units. Low review count (8 total) limits certainty.
Lofts at the Sawyer is plagued by maintenance failures, particularly extended elevator outages and water pressure issues that management has left unresolved for months. While some tenants praise individual staff members, chronic building problems and delayed communication dominate the experience.
Evidence is limited. One reviewer described poor management; another gave a neutral four-star rating with no detail. The property lists granite countertops, gated grounds, and online maintenance requests, but specific resident experience is sparse in available reviews.
All three reviews rate this property at one star. Residents report break-ins, unaddressed maintenance problems, and describe management as taking money without delivering service quality.
Management is hard to reach. One reviewer warned against living here due to an inability to contact the office, and with only two Google reviews averaging 2 stars, evidence of consistent resident experience is limited.
The physical homes here draw consistent praise, but the management company Cushman and Wakefield has earned near-universal complaints about unreachable staff, buried lease errors, and glacial responses to tenant concerns. Renters report calls and emails ignored for weeks, a missing office location, sudden charges that contradict initial terms, and maintenance failures that persist for months while costs accumulate unexpectedly.
All five-star reviews praise the office manager Maria and maintenance team for responsiveness. Residents highlight spacious, quiet units in a family-friendly Oak Cliff location near schools, shopping, and parks.
Limited review evidence so far: one five-star rating. Their website lists studio to 2-bedroom units, a resort-style pool, pickleball court, Sky Lounge, and EV charging in the Stockyards District.
The building offers a calm, updated environment at reasonable rates, but structural problems with water damage and mold have persisted for years with minimal action from management. Health and safety concerns, slow repair timelines, and three management company changes in one year suggest underlying ownership issues.
Air conditioning that cannot cool below 78-85 degrees, an elevator that breaks for weeks at a time, and management that does not answer calls or emails define the experience here. The units themselves are attractive and the location near Uptown is appealing, but tenants report severe comfort issues, long waits for repairs, and disputes over deposits and rent prices. One recent change: a new property manager named Erica improved responsiveness in 2023, though most reviews predate this shift.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Most recent reviews highlight serious pest and maintenance issues, particularly with roaches and non-functioning air conditioning. Tenant behavior problems including unsupervised children, loud motorcycles, and loose dogs have created neighborhood friction. One earlier reviewer praised the location and quiet setting, but this sentiment does not appear in recent feedback.
Lago Del Mar draws mixed reactions, with some residents enjoying the space and aesthetic. However, a recent report of cockroaches throughout units raises serious concerns about maintenance and pest control that overshadow any initial appeal.
Tenants report inconsistent management and maintenance neglect. Long-term residents cite frequent rent increases every six months, repairs only addressed after city inspection, and safety hazards like gas leaks and pest entry. A handful of older reviews praise affordability and stability, but recent complaints outweigh them.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Residents split sharply on The Aloha. Recent updates including marble floors and new appliances attract praise, but management professionalism and security concerns divide opinion.
Rawlins Street Flats offers modern finishes and gated parking in a convenient Oak Lawn location, but reviewers consistently report serious noise problems stemming from thin walls and external sources, paired with unresponsive management when issues arise. Leasing agents deliver good first impressions, yet follow-through from property management (Perry Guest Co) is weak; tenants report unresolved maintenance, poor communication, and steep early-lease-break penalties.
Fairway Apartments has struggled for years with unresolved maintenance, water damage, pest problems, and security issues. While one manager (Sandy) received praise for effort, the property suffers from aging infrastructure, inconsistent management presence, and a documented homeless presence that ownership has not contained.
Rosa Vista earns a 2.8-star rating across 22 reviews, with roughly half giving it one or two stars. Tenants describe a quiet complex but report serious problems: maintenance requests ignored or delayed for months, unresponsive leasing staff, mold, pests, and one account of armed robbery on site. Rents have risen notably over time, though some found older rates closer to $500/month.
Recent residents report ongoing maintenance failures, pest and mold issues, and management unresponsiveness. Repair work is slow and outsourced to low-cost workers; billing disputes and safety concerns appear common. Older reviews praised pet-friendliness and grounds, but the complex appears to have declined significantly.
Autumn Chase is split sharply: newer reviews praise staff like Jeanette and Jessie, but four years of tenant accounts detail persistent sewage backups, roach infestations, slow repairs (sometimes months), and frequent management turnover. The complex operates in a high-crime area with heavy police presence for gun violence.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Aston has sustained severe management and maintenance failures across years. Laundry and plumbing remain broken with no fixes. Office is unstaffed and inaccessible by phone, management ignores repair requests and withholds deposits. Rent payment system malfunctions and imposes extra charges.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Review evidence is minimal (one substantive account from five years ago). That reviewer reported widespread roaches, non-responsive owners, broken cameras in the garage, frequent car break-ins, delayed repairs, and security failures. The single voice cannot represent current conditions reliably.
Five one-star reviews over six years paint a consistent picture of neglected maintenance, staff indifference, and mismanagement. Residents report work orders closed prematurely, AC failures going unrepaired, mold, missing packages, and near-total unresponsiveness from Dallas management, with no positive experiences noted.
Park Terrace scores 2.9 stars on 14 reviews, well below the luxury high-rise category average of 3.79. Tenants report outdated apartments, poor grounds maintenance, and inconsistent management communication; staff attitudes divide reviewers sharply, with praise for maintenance tech Steve but complaints about disrespect from some office staff. Limited review detail prevents deeper assessment.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Review evidence for this location is currently limited. Landing's website lists fully-furnished units, in-unit laundry, resort-style pool, fitness center, and coworking space as standard. The business operates across 250+ U.S. cities and maintains a 24/7 support line. Specific guest experiences at this Fort Worth location are not yet reflected in available reviews.
Landing at REVL Crockett Row offers furnished apartments for stays ranging from short-term to extended monthly arrangements in Fort Worth's Cultural District. Their website lists full kitchens, in-unit laundry, resort-style pool, a 24-hour gym, and dedicated workspace designed for corporate tenants.
Review evidence is sparse and deeply troubled. Multiple accounts describe management entering units without authorization, disposing of tenants' property, and then issuing eviction notices. Rat infestations are mentioned. Several reviews appear misdirected to a different Hamilton property.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Pebbles Park has provided housing and support services that changed residents' lives, particularly for families in transition. However, past complaints about pest control, management rudeness, and strict policies suggest the experience depends heavily on timing and circumstances.
Two strong opinions dominate a thin review set. One resident calls it excellent; another reports uncleanliness, violence, and deposit disputes. Limited evidence makes it hard to know which reflects current conditions. Request recent community feedback before deciding.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
One reviewer reports severe maintenance issues: a resident fell ill twice within months, with mold developing on belongings. The reviewer attributes this to poor unit condition and lack of transparency about interior photos.
Telstar Apartments in Oak Cliff has a deeply divided track record. While a few residents praise quick maintenance responses, the overwhelming majority report a toxic living environment marked by an aggressive manager, chronic water damage and black mold, pest infestations, missing fire safety equipment, and documented discrimination. Multiple residents filed complaints with the city of Dallas and BBB. With 53% of reviews one or two stars against a category average of 3.79, this complex appears significantly worse than typical luxury high-rise competitors.
Limited review evidence across seven years. One resident cited broken AC and heat, outdated window units, and unprofessional management (MacLamar Management), describing it as overpriced despite attractive grounds. Another gave a brief five-star rating without detail.
All three reviews rate the property one or two stars. Residents report a broken water heater causing apartment flooding with no response from emergency maintenance or the office over multiple days. Others cite persistent noise from neighbors, thin walls, and safety issues including drug activity and domestic disturbances.
Review evidence for Landing Furnished Apartments at Broadway Chapter is limited. The business advertises furnished units with in-unit washer/dryer, workspace, and fast Wi-Fi, and offers both short-term and long-term stays across the DFW area.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Review evidence is limited for this property. The business offers furnished units from studios to 2+ bedrooms in Vickery Meadow, with amenities including a resort pool, 24/7 concierge, co-working space, and in-unit washer/dryer.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Review evidence is limited. Landing Furnished Apartments at Bottle House on Main operates furnished corporate housing in Fort Worth with amenities including in-unit laundry, pool, rooftop lounge, and coworking spaces.
The property offers generous floor plans, but reviewers flag neglected maintenance and a worn appearance. With only 8 Google reviews averaging 2.8 stars (50% one/two-star ratings), evidence is limited. The mix of spacious interiors against visible disrepair suggests inconsistent property upkeep.
Review data for this complex is not available. Cortland Ridglea Phase 2 operates in South Fort Worth near Baylor Scott & White Medical Center and Lockheed Martin. Their website lists 1, 2, and 3-bedroom floor plans starting at $1,322, $1,638, and $2,035 respectively, including fees.
Review evidence is limited for this business. Their website lists heart healing, spiritual abuse recovery, and grief coaching services in Oak Cliff and Casa View, with online options available. Pricing starts at $99 for online coaching.
Limited review evidence is available for Aero Apartments. The business publishes pricing and floor plans on its website and operates across Fort Worth and the Heart of Texas area.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
No individual reviews available to assess resident experience or satisfaction. The property claims premium amenities including smart home technology, pool, fitness center, dog park, and EV charging in a walkable Uptown location near Klyde Warren Park and the Arts District.
No individual reviews are currently available for this business. Based on their website, The Harrison Apartments offers furnished units from $1,995 to $2,895 with in-unit washer/dryer, pet-friendly policies, and 24-hour emergency maintenance.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Review evidence for Belleview Apartments is limited. The business offers one to three-bedroom units with on-site management and maintenance in the Cedars neighborhood near downtown Dallas.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Last updated 2026-09-16