DFW Multifamily Property Directory
Menu

Luxury in DFW Metroplex

Page 8 of 10: businesses ranked 701-800 of 925. Ranked by score and relevance, start from the top or open the full map view.

The Collection Townhomes
#701
53

The Collection Townhomes

3.5(88)✓ Google-verified

Units arrive filthy and ill-maintained on move-in, with management and leasing staff systematically unavailable to fix problems. Maintenance crew excels, but the office conducts business through an AI system, routes callers to voicemail, and takes months to return security deposits after residents move out. Prices top $3,500 monthly for what many find unfinished or run-down, and security lapses (dumpster enclosures left unattended, package theft, trespassing) have left residents feeling unsafe for a "luxury" property. Laura Rubio and a core maintenance team (including Amber) have earned repeated praise for emergency response and move-in support. Yet the broader leasing office has cycled through staff, leaving residents to chase answers by email, often waiting days for replies or getting none. A $150 monthly convenience fee fails to deliver promised services. The pattern is stark: positive interactions happen one-on-one with named staff, but systemic failures and communication breakdowns define most residents' experience.

LuxuryGarden Style (1-4 stories)
The Loren Apartments
#702
53

The Loren Apartments

3.0(175)✓ Google-verified

Half the reviews are five-star praise for leasing staff and amenities, but the other half describe uninhabitable conditions: roaches, mold, water damage, and holes in flooring that went unrepaired for months. Residents report maintenance requests ignored despite multiple contacts, an office that doesn't answer phones, and management dismissive of serious problems like health hazards affecting children. One long-term resident broke their lease after three years citing pest and mold issues; another was sent to collections for unreturned keys they say they handed over at the office. While a few recent reviews note quick fixes under new management, the weight of complaints centers on unresolved structural and pest problems, poor communication, and the gulf between the promised resort-style living and what tenants actually experience. Staff behavior divides sharply: leasing agents like Azarel and Jeannie earn praise, but a manager named Gina and others in the office have been reported as dismissive and rude when residents raise concerns. One tenant documented a shower leak turning into black mold after weeks of ignored requests and false promises of "emergency priority" fixes. The complex's proximity to Love Field and nearby shops appeals to long-term residents, but maintenance failures and security issues (break-ins, trespassing, shooting incident) undermine any appeal.

Luxury
Hulen Heights Apartments
#703
53 low data

Hulen Heights Apartments

3.7(30)

Hulen Heights draws strong loyalty from long-term residents who credit manager Diane and maintenance man Chuy with swift, personal attention to repairs and daily life. The safe, quiet location near Central Market and affordable rent anchor satisfaction. However, recent complaints surface persistent office unavailability, a serious allegation of discriminatory unit placement based on family status, and older-building noise and insulation problems that affect some units. Staff interaction quality diverges sharply across reviews.

Luxury
The Vive
#704
53 low data

The Vive

3.2(116)

The Vive draws praise for its peaceful setting and attractive grounds, but pest control failures undermine the experience. Reviewers report roach problems and paid pest services that don't deliver, which stands out as the main source of frustration.

Luxury
Terra at Knox Apartments
#705
53 low data

Terra at Knox Apartments

3.3(34)✓ Google-verified

Reviewers consistently praise Myra Perez by name for her responsiveness and kindness, and describe the neighborhood as quiet and well-located. Recent complaints center on maintenance delays of months for essential repairs, distant management, and unmet tenant habitational needs.

Luxury
Villa Capri Apartments
#706
53 low data

Villa Capri Apartments

4.0(27)✓ Google-verified

Opinions split sharply. Longer residents praise attentive management and tight-knit community; recent reviews flag unresolved pest issues, poor phone responsiveness, and a major rent hike without corresponding upkeep. Review evidence is limited by age and small sample.

Luxury
Ivy Apartments
#707
53 low data

Ivy Apartments

2.8(80)

Ivy has earned strong marks for reactive maintenance speed and staff like Jose's professionalism, plus a welcoming community feel. However, persistent utility failures, sluggish management response, and complaints about unsanitary upkeep undercut the positives and leave the property below category average.

Luxury
Sunset Heights Apartments
#708
53 low data

Sunset Heights Apartments

3.5(51)✓ Google-verified

Long-term tenants praise the location, staff (when available), and quiet surroundings, but a major split emerges: some find the complex safe and well-managed; others report roach problems, slow maintenance, management churn, and poor office contact despite paying $1,100-1,300+ monthly. Recent reviews praise staff, while older ones cite pest and upkeep failures.

Affordable HousingLuxury
Casa Hills at Dallas West
#709
52

Casa Hills at Dallas West

3.5(80)✓ Google-verified

Five-star reviewers from a year ago praised Lily, maintenance worker Carlos, and the amenities; recent one-star reviews describe a sharp decline following management change. The new office does not answer phones, residents report car break-ins and package theft, ceiling leaks flood kitchens, and one tenant's deposit was never returned despite leaving the unit clean with no arrears.

Luxury
Oaks at Five Mile
#710
52

Oaks at Five Mile

3.7(36)✓ Google-verified

Most residents report persistent maintenance failures and poor management responsiveness. Pest problems and mold have lingered for years despite complaints. While a few staff members earn individual praise, the office team is often dismissive during emergencies, deposits are disputed, and tenants feel disrespected over priority conflicts like pet policies over health hazards.

Luxury
Matilda at Lower Greenville
#711
52

Matilda at Lower Greenville

3.4(15)✓ Google-verified

Staff like Amanda earn consistent praise for attentiveness, and the walkable Lower Greenville location appeals to residents. However, recent reviews document severe black mold and water damage that management has ignored for weeks, compounded by long-standing complaints about inadequate parking, poor lease enforcement, and finish-quality shortfalls that undercut the luxury positioning.

Luxury
The Apollo at Bishop Ridge
#712
52 low data

The Apollo at Bishop Ridge

3.5(12)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Recent residents praise quiet grounds and helpful staff like Katya and Leo. Older reviews document serious pest problems and maintenance lapses, though current feedback suggests improvement.

Luxury
Birchwood Apartment Homes
#713
52

Birchwood Apartment Homes

3.0(111)✓ Google-verified

Most reviews describe unresponsive management, ignored maintenance requests, and unsanitary conditions including bugs and mold. A single recent five-star review hints at management changes, but the overwhelming pattern over the past year is tenants feeling uncared-for and frustrated by property upkeep failures.

LuxuryAffordable Housing
Teak at the Branch
#714
52

Teak at the Branch

3.2(93)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

The property is split between reliably positive experiences with named staff (Jennifer Medrano, Taner) and overwhelming complaints about corporate management failures. Those five-star reviews cite smooth leasing processes and helpful individual agents, but they sit against 44% one- or two-star ratings documenting systemic problems: stolen packages, unlocked security doors, broken elevators for months, unresponsive property managers (Juanna Goodwin, Nayive, Sarina, Jaquelyn), and delayed maintenance (one AC repair took over a month). Residents describe being sent to collections without notice, overcharged hundreds of dollars, charged for "wear and tear" after five years, and entrance by maintenance without warning or knocking. The property underwent management changes that residents cite as the turning point toward decline. Those who lived through the earlier era found it acceptable for the location and price; newer residents under the current S2 management report the complex feeling neglected compared to sister properties. Multiple long-term residents moved out explicitly due to these management and maintenance failures. The location (near trails, walkable area) and occasional agent-level professionalism are the only bright spots in otherwise consistent accounts of poor communication, unfinished repairs, and a corporate approach that prioritizes rent collection over tenant livability.

Luxury
Magnolia on Gilbert Apartments
#715
52 low data

Magnolia on Gilbert Apartments

3.7(12)✓ Google-verified

Half the reviews are five-star praise for Efren and the maintenance team's responsiveness, plus the Oak Lawn location near Katy Trail and shopping. The other half flag high prices without gym or pool, bike theft from a broken room lock, and unreliable management availability. Recent reviews tilt positive; older complaints centre on management communication.

Luxury
The Village Park
#716
52 low data

The Village Park

3.4(39)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

The Village Park offers attractive outdoor spaces and some responsive maintenance staff, but reviewers consistently report that the aging interiors fail to match advertised amenities or rent. Persistent roach infestations, leaking fixtures, electrical shorts, thin walls, and mold are the dominant complaints, with pest control described as ineffective and management often dismissive of problems.

Luxury
Sunchase Park Apartments
#717
52 low data

Sunchase Park Apartments

3.3(39)✓ Google-verified

Residents report mixed experiences. Praise centers on on-site managers, included utilities, and responsive maintenance, but significant safety and security complaints dominate: multiple reports of vehicle theft, catalytic converter theft, and open building access. A few older reviews mention noise and cleanliness issues. This complex appeals to budget-conscious renters willing to overlook security shortcomings.

Luxury
Spur Canyon Apartments
#718
52

Spur Canyon Apartments

3.3(325)✓ Google-verified

Tenants report a dramatic gap between the website's luxury marketing and day-to-day reality. Units flood repeatedly with minimal response; maintenance ignores six-month-old requests; management cycles constantly and dismisses complaints. The forced $60 Spectrum bill, coupled with unexplained fees totaling $192 per resident, stacks atop rising frustration with rodent infestations, off-leash dogs, and drug paraphernalia in common areas. A few praise leasing agent Jermaine's openness during tours and technician Brandon's speed when maintenance does arrive. The pool sits locked most seasons. Current residents describe the property as unsafe and deteriorating: rotting wood, exposed nails, water damage exposing ceiling insides, and gnats from mold. After ownership changes hands twice in three years and six management firms cycle through, accountability has collapsed. One tenant faced twenty-minute wait times calling emergency maintenance during a unit flood; repairs never happened. Office staff close the building at will and ignore phone calls. The luxury marketing materials do not match what residents experience inside their apartments.

Luxury
Landmark Apartments
#719
52

Landmark Apartments

3.7(42)✓ Google-verified

Staff responsiveness stands out: recent managers Angel and Lisa answer calls promptly, fix things fast, and treat residents warmly. The catch is infrastructure trouble that older staff improvements haven't resolved. Multiple reviewers report rodents and broken AC; one reviewer called the property disgusting after a mouse infestation. Location in Oak Cliff appeals to those seeking a close-knit vibe, but pest and climate-control issues recur across years.

Luxury
5004 Live Oak Apartments
#720
52 low data

5004 Live Oak Apartments

4.4(21)✓ Google-verified

Residents value the peaceful, well-maintained setting and quick maintenance response. One significant complaint alleges management handled a service dog accommodation slowly and possibly dishonestly after initially denying it.

LuxuryGarden Style (1-4 stories)
The Courtland
#721
52

The Courtland

2.8(106)✓ Google-verified

Life at The Courtland falls short of what residents expect from a luxury complex. Roaches and pest problems persist regardless of cleanliness, AC fails in heat, and hot water disappears for weeks. Most maintenance requests sit unaddressed, and management staff vary widely in responsiveness. Leasing agents Evonnie, Kee, and Bonnie handle move-in smoothly and stay attentive to tenant issues when contacted. However, the property itself deteriorates through neglect. Unexpected water bills and rent increases tacked to leases create financial frustration on top of the basic maintenance failures that leave units uncomfortably hot and infested.

Luxury
AVANT on Market Center
#722
52

AVANT on Market Center

2.5(106)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Most residents report significant problems: elevators broken for months, parking garage and entrance gates failing repeatedly, and vehicle theft with staff refusing police requests for video evidence. A handful praise specific leasing staff like Reynaldo Miranda and note the Design District location is walkable, but maintenance on critical systems lags badly and management rarely communicates proactively. Building 2 is notably worse than Building 1. Long-term residents express regret and warn against moving here.

LuxuryAffordable Housing
East Dallas Collection
#723
52

East Dallas Collection

3.1(45)

Recent reviews split sharply between residents who praise specific staff members for swift repairs and those describing months without air conditioning or hot water. The sharp divide reflects a management transition roughly a year ago: newer five-star reviews highlight Alma, Carlos, and Crystal handling problems promptly, while established one-star reviews detail systematic neglect of aging buildings, uncontrolled pest issues, and company resistance to repairs unless forced by city code compliance. The business owns older historic properties marketed on charm and affordability, but infrastructure maintenance remains deeply inconsistent. Staff competence matters here: when a single attendant like Armando or Crystal is reached, fixes happen within hours. The real problem is the company does not answer phones, ignores repeated work orders, and only moves when residents invoke city code compliance or break leases with legal help. One recent reviewer noted Dallas Code Compliance sees them as a chronic problem company.

Garden Style (1-4 stories)Luxury
The Fitz Apartments
#724
51 low data

The Fitz Apartments

3.8(22)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Management and maintenance staff earn consistent praise for speed and helpfulness, particularly Laura from the leasing team. Units arrive clean with modern finishes. However, parking remains a perennial flashpoint: stalls are cramped, the security gate breaks often, and staff use premium spaces during the day, compounding shortages for residents with larger vehicles.

Affordable HousingLuxury
The Moderne
#725
51

The Moderne

3.2(24)✓ Google-verified

Newer management has won over some residents with quick service and professional communication, yet the complex remains split between those praising its finishes and location versus many reporting filthy move-in units, neglected hallways, and unresolved complaints. Earlier reviews cite vacant leasing office hours, while recent five-star reviews credit Sydnee and an overhauled team for reversing the decline-though persistent gripes about security and cleanliness persist.

Luxury
Cedar at The Branch Apartments
#726
51

Cedar at The Branch Apartments

3.3(117)✓ Google-verified

Attractive apartments and good leasing staff like Jennifer mask serious operational failures once residents move in. Most complaints center on unresponsive management, recurring fire alarms, pest problems, and security lapses including break-ins and weeks-long access system failures that left doors propped open.

Luxury
Beaux House at Bishop Ridge
#727
51 low data

Beaux House at Bishop Ridge

3.5(17)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Management experience ranges sharply: one recent tenant credits Maya for professional support and quality finishes, while older reviews cite months-long maintenance delays and broken promises. Pet-friendly and spacious units near downtown appeal to budget-conscious renters, but responsiveness appears inconsistent.

LuxuryAffordable Housing
The Springs
#728
51

The Springs

2.8(121)✓ Google-verified

The Springs suffers from widespread health and safety failures. Reviewers report persistent mold, roaches, rats, and pest infestations that management refuses to address despite repeated complaints. Multiple tenants relocated after developing respiratory illness from black mold exposure. Office staff are described as rude and condescending, frequently unavailable, and known to mischarge residents. Rare praise goes to individual staff members like Ayanna and Eric, but systemic issues persist.

Luxury
Premier Gardens Apartments
#729
51 low data

Premier Gardens Apartments

3.8(6)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Long-term residents praise the location value and responsive maintenance, with rent stable for years. However, communication issues, water damage in ground-floor units, and aging interiors frustrate some. Detail is limited by just six reviews.

Garden Style (1-4 stories)Luxury
Mira Monte Apartments
#730
51 low data

Mira Monte Apartments

2.8(85)

Mira Monte's 2.8-star rating reflects serious maintenance lapses and tenant conflict. Water damage, pests, and broken pipes recur across complaints; management disputes responsibility rather than help residents. A newer ownership mentioned three years ago promised turnaround, but recent reviews show structural problems persist and staff remain unresponsive to concerns.

Luxury
White Rock Views Apartments
#731
51 low data

White Rock Views Apartments

5.0(11)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

All 11 five-star reviews highlight a tightly renovated small complex in a walkable neighborhood steps from White Rock Lake and local restaurants. Residents consistently praise the bright modern units, attentive management, and safe quiet atmosphere. The location and community vibe are the main draw.

Luxury
The Brookmoore
#732
51

The Brookmoore

2.7(67)✓ Google-verified

Strong personal service from leasing staff like Ms. Jae and Ms. Celeste drew praise, and the property itself underwent visible renovation. Since late 2024 and especially after management changed in early 2025, maintenance collapsed: AC units fail repeatedly, work orders get marked done without repair, water runs too cold or boiling, and roaches persist despite complaints. Residents report the company ignored their issues until city intervention or legal threats forced action. The security team remains responsive, but core habitability problems have destroyed resident satisfaction.

Luxury
Dixon at Stonegate
#733
51

Dixon at Stonegate

3.1(126)✓ Google-verified

After Greystar took over management in July 2026, residents report a sharp decline. Leasing staff are routinely unresponsive; callers report having to phone ten times over days to reach someone. Maintenance requests take weeks or are marked complete without work done. Excessive leaf blower use multiple days a week disrupts daytime sleep, and moving units have arrived with roach infestations, broken fixtures, dirty surfaces, and paint over vents and outlets. A prospective resident alleging Spanish-language discrimination during a tour, together with complaints about broken lease agreements honored by previous management and sudden lease violation fees never stated in contracts, suggests systemic problems beyond maintenance. Long-term residents who experienced no major issues under Willow Bridge report the property has become stressful and unlivable within weeks of Greystar's arrival.

LuxuryAffordable Housing
Candle Chase Apartments
#734
50 low data

Candle Chase Apartments

3.3(81)

About half of residents praise Ms. Angela's attentiveness and the peaceful setting, but the other half report years of unresolved flooding, mold, and broken air conditioning that management delayed addressing. Lease agreements and rent allocations have caused confusion, with some tenants ending up in eviction disputes over clerical errors they say the office should have caught.

Affordable HousingLuxury
Bennett Place Apartments
#735
50

Bennett Place Apartments

3.1(19)✓ Google-verified

Residents report a sharp divide: some praise staff members like Natalia and Vicki for responsiveness and helpfulness, but far more complain of unresolved maintenance crises, notably weeks without air conditioning in Texas heat. The complex shows its age with 1990s appliances and broken gates, while the Old East Dallas location brings both convenience to Downtown and the Medical District and exposure to neighborhood crime that reviewers cite as a serious safety issue.

Luxury
Stratford Hill @ Midtown
#736
50 low data

Stratford Hill @ Midtown

2.7(29)

Stratford Hill shows a stark divide: older five-star reviews praise specific staff members and value, but the recent majority report roaches, non-responsive management, broken amenities, and high noise from enforcement failures. At 2.7 stars, it ranks well below the luxury category average of 3.79.

Luxury
Valenceo @ Midtown Apartment
#737
50

Valenceo @ Midtown Apartment

2.8(78)✓ Google-verified

Valenceo @ Midtown suffers from severe structural and management problems that reviewers report consistently across years. Water flooding entire units during rain, persistent mold, delayed repairs, and unresponsive office staff dominate complaints. A handful of tenants praise individual staff members like Sudhakar and Sandra, and some note low rent; the wider picture is one of neglect, with management reportedly retaliating against residents who report issues.

Luxury
PS1200
#738
50 low data

PS1200

5.0(1)✓ Google-verified

One review commends the property as worth experiencing firsthand. Evidence remains limited, so prospective residents should seek additional details about specific apartment features, pricing, and amenities before deciding.

Luxury
Avenue at Lancaster
#739
50 low data

Avenue at Lancaster

5.0(1)✓ Google-verified

The single review expresses excitement about the property's imminent opening but provides no operational detail. Evidence is too limited to assess actual service quality.

LuxurySenior & 55+ Living
Gateway Oak Cliff Apartments
#740
50

Gateway Oak Cliff Apartments

3.3(75)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Property feels divided between fresh marketing (clean tours, new construction) and troubling daily realities. Residents report mold growing unchecked for months, roach infestations, at least 13 reported car thefts due to unsecured gates, and an overloaded trash system that bans most disposal methods. Staff turnover and communication breakdowns are chronic. Maintenance El and leasing staff like Kristy earn isolated praise, but the property manager is seen as inflexible and adversarial toward struggling residents. Neighbors run loud, theft and break-ins persist, and the leasing office frequently loses paperwork or closes unexpectedly. Price-to-experience mismatch troubles long-term residents most. At $1,300-$2,300/month, gateway oak cliff appears clean enough on day-one tours to attract renters, then fails to enforce basic hygiene, security, and neighbor conduct standards.

LuxuryAffordable Housing
City Central Apartments
#741
50 low data

City Central Apartments

2.8(48)✓ Google-verified

Current residents report strict policies, unresponsive management, and unmet expectations around pet accommodations. Older reviews praised the location and staff kindness, but recent feedback suggests service quality has declined significantly over the past few years.

Luxury
Veranda At Midtown Apartments
#742
50 low data

Veranda At Midtown Apartments

3.4(33)

Some residents value the neighborhood walkability and community vibe, but maintenance is slow and pest issues recur. Multiple complaints span security gaps, unannounced water shutdowns, and management unwilling to engage on problems.

Luxury
The Aurora Apartments
#743
50 low data

The Aurora Apartments

3.0(31)✓ Google-verified

Split starkly between residents who praise individual staff members (Nora, Mary, Josefina) and unit size, and many others reporting management indifference, chronic repair delays, broken gates leading to vehicle theft, roaches, and deaths on or near the property. Communication is poor; maintenance requests take a month or never arrive. Newer management appears to have degraded the complex significantly.

Luxury
Ridgecrest Terrace Apartments
#744
50 low data

Ridgecrest Terrace Apartments

2.5(24)✓ Google-verified

A 30-year-old affordable housing operator in Oak Cliff with sharp inconsistency: past residents praised Dornell and Britney Sinclair's responsiveness and clean units, but recent and older reviews paint a darker picture of pest problems, mold that persists for years, maintenance that ignores emergency calls, and a neighborhood marked by frequent police presence and violence. Parking enforcement appears harsh, especially toward visiting caregivers. The exterior has been worked on, but residents report the interior problems remain unresolved.

LuxuryAffordable Housing
Polk Villas Apartments
#745
49 low data

Polk Villas Apartments

2.9(28)✓ Google-verified

Most recent and older reviews document chronic maintenance failures, poor office management, and administrative errors that cost residents money. Staff accountability is a persistent concern, ranging from disrespectful front-office workers to repeated mistakes with parking records.

Luxury
Alton Park Apartments
#746
49

Alton Park Apartments

3.4(76)✓ Google-verified

Residents report dramatic breakdowns in the application and move-in process, with staff cancelling applications without notice, repeatedly changing requirements, and leaving applicants in crisis. Once settled, tenants face maintenance delays, a manager described as argumentative and dismissive, broken appliances (dirty refrigerators, faulty AC, non-functional gates), and amenities like pools and gyms locked during working hours. A few residents praise individual staff members and the grounds, but the overwhelming pattern is unresponsive office, ignored work orders, and rent hikes in a complex billed as income-restricted housing.

Affordable HousingLuxury
SA
#747
49 low data

Stratton Apartments

4.3(7)

Leasing staff earn consistent praise for friendliness and efficiency during move-in. One long-standing resident reports neglected maintenance, wasp infestations, and unaddressed repairs despite $1400 rent, raising questions about property upkeep.

Luxury
Buttercup Place Apartments
#748
49 low data

Buttercup Place Apartments

3.2(21)✓ Google-verified

Buttercup Place draws strong praise from residents who value affordability and staff warmth, but a stark split in ratings reflects serious unresolved complaints about pests, phone access, and resident safety.

Luxury
Skyline Place Apartments
#749
49

Skyline Place Apartments

3.3(90)

Residents report persistent problems with maintenance response times and repair quality, describing units in poor condition and staff who fail to follow through. Office staff are hard to reach by phone, and complaints about noise disturbances or lease violations receive slow or no action, leaving frustrated tenants who feel the property deteriorates while enforcement remains selective.

Affordable HousingLuxury
Summit at Mirasol Apartments
#750
49 low data

Summit at Mirasol Apartments

3.5(47)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Recent management changes (Ms. Mattie) have drawn strong praise for attentiveness and visible upkeep, with maintenance completing work quickly. However, older reviews flag office phones going unanswered and communication gaps on move-outs; current sentiment skews positive but the complex sits below the category average.

Luxury
The Branch
#751
49

The Branch

3.7(12)

Residents report a sharp divide between front-line staff, who earn praise for attentiveness and efficiency, and management, which is often unresponsive and slow to address serious issues. Security problems dominate complaints: multiple car break-ins, carjackings, package theft, and broken gates that remained unfixed despite monthly security fees. Some tenants also cite water damage, mold, noise complaints unresolved, and dirty grounds.

Luxury
Tree House Apartments
#752
49 low data

Tree House Apartments

3.8(8)

Quiet setting near Lake Como with dated but comfortable units. Long-term residents report peace and decent value, though the building shows its age and experience varies by lease term.

Luxury
The Trellis at Lake Highlands
#753
49

The Trellis at Lake Highlands

3.1(86)✓ Google-verified

A narrow split between five-star praise for the location and initial move-in experience and one-star warnings about persistent maintenance failures dominates reviews. Air conditioning breakdowns lasting months, cockroach infestations resistant to pest control, slow maintenance response times, and surprise billing charges recur across multiple recent reviews. Some residents credit the property manager for friendliness, but most complaints focus on management's reluctance to address habitability issues like mold and humidity that reviewers say affect health and safety.

LuxuryGarden Style (1-4 stories)
Gala Apartments
#754
49 low data

Gala Apartments

4.2(5)

One tour appointment resulted in a closed office and no staff contact, leaving prospective residents with concerns about management and security. A separate reviewer expressed satisfaction, though limited detail is available.

LuxurySenior & 55+ Living
The Atlas Apartments
#755
48 low data

The Atlas Apartments

2.4(22)✓ Google-verified

Residents report widespread neglect across maintenance, safety, and management. Recurring problems include slow or incomplete repairs, pest infestations, water damage, and deteriorated common areas. A handful of older positive reviews mention good staff and location, but 64% of recent ratings are one or two stars, reflecting sustained tenant dissatisfaction.

Luxury
Times Square On the Hill
#756
48

Times Square On the Hill

2.9(45)✓ Google-verified

Tenants consistently praise leasing staff, particularly Jordan and Benitta, for patient and friendly service during application and move-in. Long-term residents report feeling safe and satisfied, with maintenance generally available on request. However, recent reviews flag unresolved maintenance emergencies like water outages, chronic parking strain, vehicle theft and damage, and inconsistent office courtesy across different time periods.

Luxury
Crestridge Apartments
#757
48 low data

Crestridge Apartments

3.1(34)✓ Google-verified

Location draws praise from residents who value walkability in Dallas. Recent complaints center on unresponsive maintenance, poor tenant interactions, and broken appliances like toilets and refrigerators left unfixed despite repeated requests.

Luxury
Francesca Apartments
#758
48

Francesca Apartments

3.2(23)✓ Google-verified

Francesca Apartments is deeply polarized. Staff member Javier earns consistent praise for fast maintenance response, but the broader picture is bleak: residents report roaches, rats, and water bugs; a neglectful property office; weeks-long water outages; and homeless individuals frequently on grounds. The infrastructure is aging, ceilings crack and get painted over, pipes burst repeatedly, and the gate fails so often it stays propped open for days. The location in Oak Lawn and mid-range pricing once made it tolerable, but recent residents say it no longer justifies the downside.

Luxury
Bentley Apartments
#759
48 low data

Bentley Apartments

5.0(11)✓ Google-verified

All 11 reviews are five-star. Tenants praise Valerie (owner/manager), Steve, and Rocky Champions for professionalism and hands-on care. Units are furnished, gated, and positioned near restaurants in a safe Knox-Henderson area.

Luxury
Providence at Village Fair
#760
48 low data

Providence at Village Fair

3.1(21)

Security gaps and maintenance neglect have eroded what was once a quiet, spacious complex. Recent reviews cite stolen cars, non-functioning gates, delayed repairs, inflated move-out charges, and unresponsive management, while older residents praised the floor plans and calm atmosphere.

Luxury
Royal Palms
#761
48 low data

Royal Palms

3.2(12)✓ Google-verified

Royal Palms draws mixed reviews tied to management inconsistency. Older residents recall quiet, clean units and good value. Recent reviews flag poor communication on parking rules, aggressive towing, hidden fees, and thin soundproofing between units.

Affordable HousingLuxury
Biscayne Apartments
#762
48 low data

Biscayne Apartments

2.5(27)✓ Google-verified

Roaches, bedbugs, and utility failures recur across years of reviews. Recent residents report safety concerns and management inaction on serious issues despite better experiences years ago.

Luxury
Village East Apartments
#763
47 low data

Village East Apartments

2.5(21)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Two residents who moved out after 2+ years reported relentless appliance failures, a severely understaffed maintenance team, and management that declined to compensate for long-term problems. Security incidents (break-ins, stolen packages, homeless individuals on grounds) went unaddressed despite resident complaints; staff called the situation beyond their control.

Luxury
Victor Prosper II
#764
47 low data

Victor Prosper II

3.7(6)

Reviews split sharply: some residents praise staff attentiveness and quick maintenance, while others report stuck elevators, dead cell signal in the parking garage, loud weekend noise, and serious concerns about unauthorized entry and management conduct. Limited evidence overall.

Luxury
Lakewood Lodge
#765
47 low data

Lakewood Lodge

3.6(11)

The property itself can look better than expected, but management remains unresponsive to maintenance requests that drag on for months or longer. Multiple reviewers report city code violations, unpaid water bills resulting in liens, break-ins due to unsecured gates, and substance use visible on the grounds. You will likely need to escalate issues beyond the office to resolve them.

Luxury
HA
#766
47

Highpoint At Wynnewood

3.4(27)Publishes prices

The newly built location initially appeals to residents, but reviews consistently describe roach infestations, filthy common areas, and unresponsive management. Residents report slow repair response, management disputes, withheld belongings, and security concerns. The contrast between the building's newness and actual living conditions is a recurring complaint.

Luxury
Lumiere's Place
#767
47 low data

Lumiere's Place

2.6(12)✓ Google-verified

Lumiere's Place suffers from broken systems and poor upkeep. Security gates fail regularly, letting unauthorized residents in and creating constant noise; cockroach and rodent problems persist. Management responsiveness varies sharply: some tenants report quick fixes from staff like Jess and Rebecca, but many others say calls go unanswered for weeks or months despite repeated attempts.

Luxury
Remond Cliff Plaza Apartments
#769
47 low data

Remond Cliff Plaza Apartments

3.2(16)

Reviewers report heavy fees across parking, pets, and yard items, paired with complaints about aging units and high rent relative to condition. Some residents keep their homes long-term, though dissatisfied tenants note better options exist at similar price points.

Luxury
Belmont Court Apartments
#770
47 low data

Belmont Court Apartments

3.2(14)

Belmont Court struggles with persistent maintenance failures and pest problems that management does not address. Despite the Old East Dallas location and some staff praise, repeated complaints about rot, leaking ceilings, rodents, poor security, and high costs for poor conditions dominate recent reviews. Evidence is limited in scope but heavily negative.

Affordable HousingLuxury
The Vail
#771
47 low data

The Vail

3.5(100)✓ Google-verified

The Vail presents a stark split: older five-star reviews praise a former manager named Mary and clean grounds, but recent reviews (last year and recent months) describe persistent maintenance failures, mold, leaking roofs and AC units, and unresponsive management. The property has cycled through multiple managers with mixed reputations, and current Freshwater Group management is widely reported as absent, dismissive, and slow to address core issues like toilets, dishwashers, and pest control.

Luxury
Vernazza Apartment Homes
#772
47

Vernazza Apartment Homes

3.2(29)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Vernazzo is badly divided by manager tenure. When former manager Crestina led, tenants praised responsive maintenance and her attentiveness to problems. Since new management took over (notably manager Cristian), reviews describe aggressive conduct, locked apartments with tenant belongings trapped inside, electricity cuts, and unaddressed complaints about pests, noise neighbors, and slow repairs. Problems span uncontrolled rat and fly infestations, air conditioning failures in summer heat, loud tenants from midnight to 5 am with little enforcement, and security cameras that don't work. Several reviews note unexpected fees not in contracts and week-long waits for repairs. The complex sits in Oak Cliff near active crime scenes and frequent loud parties, which reviewers say does not justify the rent.

Luxury
Carriage House Apartments
#773
46 low data

Carriage House Apartments

2.8(23)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Carriage House sits in a walkable, safe Lower Greenville location but faces deep structural issues. Recent Perry Guest ownership prompted mass evictions at the connected sister property with plans for demolition; leases contain clauses allowing termination on 60 days' notice without cause. Long-standing complaints center on unresponsive management, chronic pest infestations, seasonal AC failures, and maintenance delays. One recent tenant praised quick maintenance response and friendly staff under new ownership, yet communication remains sluggish. This is a high-risk property for renters seeking stability.

Affordable HousingLuxury
Woodglen Luxury Apartments
#774
46

Woodglen Luxury Apartments

2.6(33)✓ Google-verified

A 2.6-star complex where long-term residents once praised management and safety, but recent reviews paint a darker picture of safety hazards, delayed maintenance, and hostile staff interactions. Electrical problems and stove failures went unaddressed for months; tenants report threats from management over lease breaks and unpaid balances. Earlier five-star reviews credited specific staff members (Lorie García, Rebecca, Day), though recent reviewers express frustration with the same office leadership.

Luxury
Le Parc
#775
46

Le Parc

1.9(19)✓ Google-verified

Over the past two years, Le Parc's management has earned widespread complaints about unresponsive maintenance and seasonal climate control lapses, leaving tenants without hot water or AC for extended periods. A recent management change has drawn one positive review praising responsiveness, but 79% of reviews remain one or two stars, citing mold, plumbing backups, pest problems, and repeated gate failures across the complex.

Luxury
Courtyards at Gateway
#776
46 low data

Courtyards at Gateway

2.5(10)✓ Google-verified

Most recent reviews paint a stark picture of neglected, unsanitary conditions: potholes, rodent and insect infestations, moldy interiors, and structural concerns. Residents and visitors report management dismisses maintenance complaints. One older review praised peaceful living and hands-on management, but 60% of reviews are one or two stars, and safety complaints appear ongoing.

Luxury
Travis Gardens Apartments
#777
46 low data

Travis Gardens Apartments

3.1(30)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Travis Gardens has a stark divide: tenants with recent positive interactions praise managers by name (Shonda, Christy) and cite safety improvements, while older reviews document serious failings in maintenance, pest control, and office relations. The property appears to have undergone management changes that improved some areas, though security and parking issues persist.

Garden Style (1-4 stories)Affordable HousingLuxury
Lake Chateau Apartments
#778
46 low data

Lake Chateau Apartments

2.5(34)✓ Google-verified

Lake Chateau struggles with serious structural and pest problems that recur across years of reviews. Residents report cockroaches, bed bugs, and fleas alongside outdated plumbing, mold, and slow AC repairs. Security lapses and aggressive towing add to the frustration, though the leasing office earned one mention for timely approvals.

Luxury
Spring Glen Apartments
#779
46 low data

Spring Glen Apartments

3.5(62)

Spring Glen is a quiet, well-kept complex where some residents stay for years and praise the staff. However, long-standing pool closures and occasional complaints about pricing undercut the experience.

Luxury
West 7th Apartments
#780
46 low data

West 7th Apartments

3.6(30)

Reviewers praise the location near the Cultural District and say friendly staff make tours pleasant, but chronic AC failures, mold, and flooding have prompted one-star reviews. Maintenance response times stretch days to weeks; some tenants report months waiting for security deposit refunds. The property has potential but struggles with repairs.

LuxuryGarden Style (1-4 stories)
Olive At Vernon
#781
45 low data

Olive At Vernon

3.2(9)

A small luxury complex undergoing ownership transition shows promise but with uneven execution. New management responds quickly to maintenance and pest issues, and the all-bills-paid model appeals to residents. Older reviews cite leasing staff unreachability; current residents report late-night repairs, inadequate parking guidance, and poor soundproofing that lets neighbor smoke into units despite lease violations.

Luxury
The Bennett Apartments
#782
45 low data

The Bennett Apartments

3.4(8)✓ Google-verified

Half the recent reviews are five-star, but the other half reveal serious problems: roach and mold infestation, non-functional air conditioning during summer, and broken appliances that management refuses to repair properly. Tenants report unresponsive management, withheld security deposits totaling around $1,000, poor maintenance response, and package theft by residents. Limited evidence available, but complaints center on habitability and management reliability.

Luxury
Westover Trails Apartments
#783
45 low data

Westover Trails Apartments

3.3(3)✓ Google-verified

Reviewers describe a quiet, older brick complex with spacious units and tidy grounds, but reports of slow maintenance responses and unclear policies around lease renewal cosmetics (carpet cleaning, painting) warrant asking directly before signing.

Garden Style (1-4 stories)Luxury
The Pointe Apartments
#784
45 low data

The Pointe Apartments

2.5(15)✓ Google-verified

Multiple residents report filthy units, unresponsive management, and security failures including break-ins. A handful of older reviews praised the low rent and location, but recent complaints vastly outweigh any positives.

Luxury
Fort West Apartments
#785
45

Fort West Apartments

2.7(21)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Fort West Apartments is heavily penalized by persistent maintenance failures and a near-absent management presence, though a small number of tenants report quiet living and handled work orders. Across multiple reviews, the core complaints remain: cars towed after confusion over registration procedures, roach infestations that management cancels requests to address, raw sewage backups, week-long flooding without mold checks, and an office staff that rarely answers phones or visits the property. The property is marketed as affordable with rates low enough to suggest cut corners; their website lists pest control at $5/unit monthly and a $500 apartment transfer fee. One review defends management, arguing residents cause most issues, but this view is vastly outnumbered by detailed accounts of actual infrastructure failure (single dumpster overflowing weekly, gate constantly broken, no security). Safety concerns and unresolved tenant disputes dominate the record.

Affordable HousingLuxury
Stardust
#786
45

Stardust

2.4(15)✓ Google-verified

Stardust struggles with persistent maintenance failures and neglected amenities that contradict its marketing photos. Current residents report non-working air conditioning, broken washers and dryers, a brown pool, a non-functional gate, and pest problems despite the property's designed appeal. Staff responsiveness is mixed: leasing agents like Rick Plock and Katie earned praise for attentiveness, but front office and maintenance fall short on communication and follow-through. The gap between advertised luxury and lived experience is the core complaint.

Luxury
East 9th
#787
45 low data

East 9th

3.4(5)✓ Google-verified

A prolonged fire alarm failure that management could not reach or resolve left residents and neighbors without answers for nearly a full day. The reviews offer no concrete praise and focus instead on poor response times during a safety issue.

Luxury
Verandah Flats Apartments
#788
44

Verandah Flats Apartments

1.8(11)✓ Google-verified

Nine of eleven reviews report severe habitability issues: months without heat, AC, or hot water; rodents and fleas throughout; structural holes; and management inattention. The complex deteriorated notably after ownership changes. A lone positive reviewer praised new management's effort, but subsequent reviews document continued crises including electrical fires and extended utility outages, with rent concessions promised but not delivered.

Luxury
CFNI Cornerstone Bldg.
#789
44 low data

CFNI Cornerstone Bldg.

4.8(6)

Residents describe their stay as comfortable and meaningful. The few available reviews offer limited detail, but express satisfaction with the living space and community environment.

Luxury
Live Oak Manor Apartments
#790
44 low data

Live Oak Manor Apartments

3.0(22)✓ Google-verified

Live Oak Manor has mixed experiences tied to which management company runs it. Residents consistently praise individual staff members like Gavin and Javier for responsiveness, and note the apartments themselves are modern and attractive. However, a significant block of recent tenants report ongoing problems with maintenance of common areas, pest control, noise from thin walls, and disputed parking enforcement, with management blamed for not responding to repeated complaints.

LuxuryAffordable Housing
TB
#791
44 low data

The Berkeley

3.4(5)

Two guests rated the leasing team highly for responsiveness, but a recent visitor reported a dismissive tour experience paired with visibly neglected common spaces. Staff cited biannual cleaning; hallways showed dirt and poor upkeep. Earlier resident concern: new management tightened guest and visitor policies without resident input.

Luxury
The District Apartments
#792
44 low data

The District Apartments

3.7(20)✓ Google-verified

Split between glowing praise for staff like Ema and Victor and serious complaints about maintenance failures. Recent reviews cite mold, HVAC breakdowns, and disputes over lease termination; older tenants report responsive management and safe grounds, but the pattern of unresolved environmental issues and management conflicts is hard to ignore.

Luxury
Alta River Park
#794
44 low data

Alta River Park

1.0(1)✓ Google-verified

The single available review criticizes pricing as excessive. Review evidence is too limited to characterize the full resident experience or validate other aspects of the property.

Luxury
West 3855 - Camp Bowie Apartments
#795
43 low data

West 3855 - Camp Bowie Apartments

4.3(7)✓ Google-verified

Units are updated despite the building's age. Courtyard layout and interior upkeep draw approval, though prospective tenants should expect a vintage structure.

Garden Style (1-4 stories)Luxury
Sunchase Square Apartments
#796
43

Sunchase Square Apartments

2.7(46)

Most residents report serious safety concerns, frequent property crime, and unresponsive maintenance. While some praise individual staff members like the leasing office, systemic issues with security, aging laundry equipment, and inconsistent AC service dominate the feedback. Management conduct receives mixed reviews, with some residents citing helpful assistance and others describing rudeness and financial pressure.

Luxury
OR
#797
43 low data

Oak Ridge Apartments

4.2(17)

Residents report friendly staff and a calm atmosphere, but serious complaints about maintenance failures, pests, and billing inconsistencies undercut the experience. Limited review detail makes full assessment difficult.

Senior & 55+ LivingAffordable HousingLuxury
Santa Barbara Gardens Apartments
#798
43 low data

Santa Barbara Gardens Apartments

4.4(16)✓ Google-verified

Santa Barbara has earned strong loyalty from long-term residents who praise its quiet setting and hands-on management, particularly under Carmen and Marina. Recent shifts in staffing have eroded that advantage: newer reviews report an empty office, unanswered phones, and no one available to help.

Garden Style (1-4 stories)Luxury
West 1901
#799
43 low data

West 1901

4.8(4)✓ Google-verified

West 1901 maintains a 4.8-star rating across four Google reviews with no low ratings. Limited review text prevents detail, but the strong score suggests residents report positive management.

Garden Style (1-4 stories)Luxury
Mid Elm Lofts
#800
43 low data

Mid Elm Lofts

5.0(3)✓ Google-verified

The single review on file describes a spacious, clean loft in a secure downtown building, well-positioned for city living. Evidence is limited to one account.

Luxury

Last updated 2026-09-16