Page 6 of 6: businesses ranked 501-597 of 597. Start from the top.
Security gaps and maintenance neglect have eroded what was once a quiet, spacious complex. Recent reviews cite stolen cars, non-functioning gates, delayed repairs, inflated move-out charges, and unresponsive management, while older residents praised the floor plans and calm atmosphere.
Royal Palms draws mixed reviews tied to management inconsistency. Older residents recall quiet, clean units and good value. Recent reviews flag poor communication on parking rules, aggressive towing, hidden fees, and thin soundproofing between units.
Roaches, bedbugs, and utility failures recur across years of reviews. Recent residents report safety concerns and management inaction on serious issues despite better experiences years ago.
Reviews split sharply: some residents praise staff attentiveness and quick maintenance, while others report stuck elevators, dead cell signal in the parking garage, loud weekend noise, and serious concerns about unauthorized entry and management conduct. Limited evidence overall.
The property itself can look better than expected, but management remains unresponsive to maintenance requests that drag on for months or longer. Multiple reviewers report city code violations, unpaid water bills resulting in liens, break-ins due to unsecured gates, and substance use visible on the grounds. You will likely need to escalate issues beyond the office to resolve them.
The newly built location initially appeals to residents, but reviews consistently describe roach infestations, filthy common areas, and unresponsive management. Residents report slow repair response, management disputes, withheld belongings, and security concerns. The contrast between the building's newness and actual living conditions is a recurring complaint.
Lumiere's Place suffers from broken systems and poor upkeep. Security gates fail regularly, letting unauthorized residents in and creating constant noise; cockroach and rodent problems persist. Management responsiveness varies sharply: some tenants report quick fixes from staff like Jess and Rebecca, but many others say calls go unanswered for weeks or months despite repeated attempts.
Reviewers report heavy fees across parking, pets, and yard items, paired with complaints about aging units and high rent relative to condition. Some residents keep their homes long-term, though dissatisfied tenants note better options exist at similar price points.
Belmont Court struggles with persistent maintenance failures and pest problems that management does not address. Despite the Old East Dallas location and some staff praise, repeated complaints about rot, leaking ceilings, rodents, poor security, and high costs for poor conditions dominate recent reviews. Evidence is limited in scope but heavily negative.
The Vail presents a stark split: older five-star reviews praise a former manager named Mary and clean grounds, but recent reviews (last year and recent months) describe persistent maintenance failures, mold, leaking roofs and AC units, and unresponsive management. The property has cycled through multiple managers with mixed reputations, and current Freshwater Group management is widely reported as absent, dismissive, and slow to address core issues like toilets, dishwashers, and pest control.
Vernazzo is badly divided by manager tenure. When former manager Crestina led, tenants praised responsive maintenance and her attentiveness to problems. Since new management took over (notably manager Cristian), reviews describe aggressive conduct, locked apartments with tenant belongings trapped inside, electricity cuts, and unaddressed complaints about pests, noise neighbors, and slow repairs. Problems span uncontrolled rat and fly infestations, air conditioning failures in summer heat, loud tenants from midnight to 5 am with little enforcement, and security cameras that don't work. Several reviews note unexpected fees not in contracts and week-long waits for repairs. The complex sits in Oak Cliff near active crime scenes and frequent loud parties, which reviewers say does not justify the rent.
Carriage House sits in a walkable, safe Lower Greenville location but faces deep structural issues. Recent Perry Guest ownership prompted mass evictions at the connected sister property with plans for demolition; leases contain clauses allowing termination on 60 days' notice without cause. Long-standing complaints center on unresponsive management, chronic pest infestations, seasonal AC failures, and maintenance delays. One recent tenant praised quick maintenance response and friendly staff under new ownership, yet communication remains sluggish. This is a high-risk property for renters seeking stability.
A 2.6-star complex where long-term residents once praised management and safety, but recent reviews paint a darker picture of safety hazards, delayed maintenance, and hostile staff interactions. Electrical problems and stove failures went unaddressed for months; tenants report threats from management over lease breaks and unpaid balances. Earlier five-star reviews credited specific staff members (Lorie García, Rebecca, Day), though recent reviewers express frustration with the same office leadership.
Over the past two years, Le Parc's management has earned widespread complaints about unresponsive maintenance and seasonal climate control lapses, leaving tenants without hot water or AC for extended periods. A recent management change has drawn one positive review praising responsiveness, but 79% of reviews remain one or two stars, citing mold, plumbing backups, pest problems, and repeated gate failures across the complex.
Most recent reviews paint a stark picture of neglected, unsanitary conditions: potholes, rodent and insect infestations, moldy interiors, and structural concerns. Residents and visitors report management dismisses maintenance complaints. One older review praised peaceful living and hands-on management, but 60% of reviews are one or two stars, and safety complaints appear ongoing.
Lake Chateau struggles with serious structural and pest problems that recur across years of reviews. Residents report cockroaches, bed bugs, and fleas alongside outdated plumbing, mold, and slow AC repairs. Security lapses and aggressive towing add to the frustration, though the leasing office earned one mention for timely approvals.
A small luxury complex undergoing ownership transition shows promise but with uneven execution. New management responds quickly to maintenance and pest issues, and the all-bills-paid model appeals to residents. Older reviews cite leasing staff unreachability; current residents report late-night repairs, inadequate parking guidance, and poor soundproofing that lets neighbor smoke into units despite lease violations.
Half the recent reviews are five-star, but the other half reveal serious problems: roach and mold infestation, non-functional air conditioning during summer, and broken appliances that management refuses to repair properly. Tenants report unresponsive management, withheld security deposits totaling around $1,000, poor maintenance response, and package theft by residents. Limited evidence available, but complaints center on habitability and management reliability.
Multiple residents report filthy units, unresponsive management, and security failures including break-ins. A handful of older reviews praised the low rent and location, but recent complaints vastly outweigh any positives.
Stardust struggles with persistent maintenance failures and neglected amenities that contradict its marketing photos. Current residents report non-working air conditioning, broken washers and dryers, a brown pool, a non-functional gate, and pest problems despite the property's designed appeal. Staff responsiveness is mixed: leasing agents like Rick Plock and Katie earned praise for attentiveness, but front office and maintenance fall short on communication and follow-through. The gap between advertised luxury and lived experience is the core complaint.
A prolonged fire alarm failure that management could not reach or resolve left residents and neighbors without answers for nearly a full day. The reviews offer no concrete praise and focus instead on poor response times during a safety issue.
Nine of eleven reviews report severe habitability issues: months without heat, AC, or hot water; rodents and fleas throughout; structural holes; and management inattention. The complex deteriorated notably after ownership changes. A lone positive reviewer praised new management's effort, but subsequent reviews document continued crises including electrical fires and extended utility outages, with rent concessions promised but not delivered.
Residents describe their stay as comfortable and meaningful. The few available reviews offer limited detail, but express satisfaction with the living space and community environment.
Live Oak Manor has mixed experiences tied to which management company runs it. Residents consistently praise individual staff members like Gavin and Javier for responsiveness, and note the apartments themselves are modern and attractive. However, a significant block of recent tenants report ongoing problems with maintenance of common areas, pest control, noise from thin walls, and disputed parking enforcement, with management blamed for not responding to repeated complaints.
Split between glowing praise for staff like Ema and Victor and serious complaints about maintenance failures. Recent reviews cite mold, HVAC breakdowns, and disputes over lease termination; older tenants report responsive management and safe grounds, but the pattern of unresolved environmental issues and management conflicts is hard to ignore.
Most residents report serious safety concerns, frequent property crime, and unresponsive maintenance. While some praise individual staff members like the leasing office, systemic issues with security, aging laundry equipment, and inconsistent AC service dominate the feedback. Management conduct receives mixed reviews, with some residents citing helpful assistance and others describing rudeness and financial pressure.
Residents report friendly staff and a calm atmosphere, but serious complaints about maintenance failures, pests, and billing inconsistencies undercut the experience. Limited review detail makes full assessment difficult.
The single review on file describes a spacious, clean loft in a secure downtown building, well-positioned for city living. Evidence is limited to one account.
Lofts at Fairpark struggles with chronic management failures that overshadow its spacious loft layouts and Fair Park location. Tenants report months-long elevator outages, widespread roach infestations, water damage, and unresponsive staff who prioritize rent collection over repairs or tenant communication.
Shelby 2707 divides tenants sharply: half rate it excellent, half report serious problems. Long-standing issues include broken air conditioning during Texas summers, unanswered maintenance requests, and sparse office availability, though individual staff like Stephanie earn praise for their help. Reviewers warn that moving in involves confusion and staff absence, and repairs take weeks or months.
Kat receives praise for going above and beyond in customer service. Evidence is limited to a single five-star review.
Front-desk leasing staff, particularly Vanessa, earn consistent praise for professionalism and smooth move-ins. However, residents report that maintenance is slow and unresponsive. Recurring complaints include ceiling leaks, mold, plumbing failures, roaches, and months-long waits for repairs like stove fixes and shower knobs. Parking is chaotic and cars reportedly unsafe.
All five-star reviews describe a welcoming, clean community. Reviews are limited (three total, all from over nine years ago) and do not speak directly to luxury high-rise amenities or services.
Three reviews average 4.7 stars with no complaints logged. Limited detail available from review text alone.
Deep Ellum Living's rental management is marked by systemic failures that tenants report repeatedly: locked-out residents and broken security doors, evictions despite paid rent, and staff that ignore maintenance complaints until safety emergencies force action. A 1.3-star rating across 121 reviews reflects widespread frustration with unresponsive management, while former tenants describe discriminatory treatment, deposit disputes, and a maintenance team unable to influence policy despite tenant support.
One reviewer praised staff member Miya for professionalism and fraud prevention during leasing. They noted state-of-the-art units, underground parking, and proximity to downtown as standout features. Review evidence is limited to a single five-star account.
Mountain View scores 2.9 stars, well below the 3.79 category average, with 44% of reviews rating it one or two stars. Persistent complaints centre on crime (car break-ins, apartment theft), pest problems, and major maintenance failures, particularly AC outages during summer heat. Limited positive feedback suggests management responsiveness has improved for some residents, but safety and habitability concerns dominate the recent record.
Leasing experience here is highly inconsistent. One prospect waited 90 minutes after a scheduled tour was canceled without notice; staff ignored multiple calls and requests for follow-up. Another caller reported a condescending tone and dismissal of income-restricted unit inquiries. A third reviewer found staff helpful, but the pattern leans toward communication failures and unprofessional conduct during critical moments.
A polarized complex where two staff members, Anthony Robinson and David, earned strong praise for responsiveness; the location and all-bills-paid option drew repeat mention. Yet recent and earlier reviews document paper-thin walls, maintenance delays stretching weeks, a leasing team that ignored calls and emails, and persistent indoor air and cleanliness issues. Safety concerns and neighborhood conditions appear serious enough to deter many.
Five of seven reviews from the past year describe an absent or unreachable management office under Revival Property, with tenants reporting the building falling apart and staff ignoring requests. Two earlier residents praise the property's beauty and maintenance head Javier Rafael's responsiveness, but recent reviews paint a picture of deteriorating conditions and management neglect that contradicts those experiences.
Residents describe consistently poor experiences: maintenance requests languish for weeks or months without resolution, staff are dismissive and sometimes hostile when contacted, and paid pest control services fail to work. The handful of neutral comments offer little counterweight to complaints about unresponsiveness and disrespect from management.
Most residents report uncontrolled temperatures, slow or absent maintenance, and serious pest and mold issues. One staff member, De'Angelo, earned consistent praise for his responsiveness and attitude, but this did not resolve widespread facility and management problems that led many to call the property uninhabitable.
Evidence is limited to a single review citing rudeness at the leasing office. More data would be needed to assess the community fairly.
Despite low ratings, some residents report affordable pricing and responsive maintenance, but pervasive complaints center on persistent roach infestations, water and cooling system failures, and aggressive towing practices. The gap between positive and negative experiences suggests unit and tenant variability rather than consistent service.
Long-time residents recall excellent service and Rick's hands-on management, but recent reviews flag ownership and property management changes that have left grounds unmaintained, homeless encampments unmanaged, and tenant conflicts unresolved. Limited review evidence; two older five-star reviews contrast sharply with a detailed one-star account of deterioration since new ownership.
The Springs Apartments faced a major property closure and tenant eviction around 2022. Before that, reviews divided sharply: some praised responsive maintenance and kind staff, while others reported months-long elevator outages, water failures post-winter storm, and sudden fee hikes. Current operational status is unclear from reviews alone.
Limited review detail is available. Five-star and one/two-star reviews are split nearly evenly, suggesting mixed resident experiences. The few detailed comments mention pleasant finishes, though most reviews lack specific insight into maintenance, amenities, or management responsiveness.
Limited review evidence: one commenter praised the industrial apartment style, but a pet owner flagged breed restrictions. The 3.7-star average reflects mixed experience.
One reviewer praised security cameras, on-site management, and timely repairs under new ownership. Another reported a two-day power outage with no maintenance response. Evidence is thin due to limited reviews.
Residents report severe pest infestations and maintenance neglect, with complaints going unresolved for months. The building has structural issues and recent upgrades are visibly cut-corner; staff have been described as unresponsive and rude. Location in Junius Heights is quiet, but living conditions fall well short of luxury standards.
Both reviewers gave five stars. One toured unit 103 and noted the generous layout. Review volume is limited, so this profile reflects initial impressions only.
One recent reviewer praised quick fixes and rent assistance, but seven of ten ratings are one or two stars. The core issues cluster around mold so severe it damaged belongings and caused health problems, utilities left non-functional without communication, and pest infestations. Management disputes appear to centre on whether serious conditions are acknowledged.
The apartment complex is rated 1.8/5 across 13 reviews, with 77% giving one or two stars. Residents report persistent plumbing failures, broken laundry facilities, and security problems including squatters. Management rarely responds to calls or opens the office during posted hours, and the property has cycled through multiple management companies. Earlier reviews mention staff friendliness and one management transition that seemed promising, but current feedback shows deterioration and unresolved maintenance issues dating years back.
Recent reviews paint a troubling picture of management failures and persistent maintenance lapses. Tenants report roach infestations, mold, broken washing machines left defunct for over a year, and scattered debris from recent construction. While older reviews praised friendly neighbors, current residents cite poor communication from Fowler Property Management and billing surprises after lease renewal.
Two recent five-star reviews praise clean interiors and helpful staff, but this conflicts sharply with five one-star reviews from prior years citing chronic roach infestation, months-long appliance outages, black mold, unresponsive management, and escalating safety issues. The gap suggests either major operational changes in the past two years or inconsistent service across units. Low review count (8 total) limits certainty.
Lofts at the Sawyer is plagued by maintenance failures, particularly extended elevator outages and water pressure issues that management has left unresolved for months. While some tenants praise individual staff members, chronic building problems and delayed communication dominate the experience.
All three reviews rate this property at one star. Residents report break-ins, unaddressed maintenance problems, and describe management as taking money without delivering service quality.
Management is hard to reach. One reviewer warned against living here due to an inability to contact the office, and with only two Google reviews averaging 2 stars, evidence of consistent resident experience is limited.
All five-star reviews praise the office manager Maria and maintenance team for responsiveness. Residents highlight spacious, quiet units in a family-friendly Oak Cliff location near schools, shopping, and parks.
Air conditioning that cannot cool below 78-85 degrees, an elevator that breaks for weeks at a time, and management that does not answer calls or emails define the experience here. The units themselves are attractive and the location near Uptown is appealing, but tenants report severe comfort issues, long waits for repairs, and disputes over deposits and rent prices. One recent change: a new property manager named Erica improved responsiveness in 2023, though most reviews predate this shift.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Most recent reviews highlight serious pest and maintenance issues, particularly with roaches and non-functioning air conditioning. Tenant behavior problems including unsupervised children, loud motorcycles, and loose dogs have created neighborhood friction. One earlier reviewer praised the location and quiet setting, but this sentiment does not appear in recent feedback.
Lago Del Mar draws mixed reactions, with some residents enjoying the space and aesthetic. However, a recent report of cockroaches throughout units raises serious concerns about maintenance and pest control that overshadow any initial appeal.
Tenants report inconsistent management and maintenance neglect. Long-term residents cite frequent rent increases every six months, repairs only addressed after city inspection, and safety hazards like gas leaks and pest entry. A handful of older reviews praise affordability and stability, but recent complaints outweigh them.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Residents split sharply on The Aloha. Recent updates including marble floors and new appliances attract praise, but management professionalism and security concerns divide opinion.
Rawlins Street Flats offers modern finishes and gated parking in a convenient Oak Lawn location, but reviewers consistently report serious noise problems stemming from thin walls and external sources, paired with unresponsive management when issues arise. Leasing agents deliver good first impressions, yet follow-through from property management (Perry Guest Co) is weak; tenants report unresolved maintenance, poor communication, and steep early-lease-break penalties.
Rosa Vista earns a 2.8-star rating across 22 reviews, with roughly half giving it one or two stars. Tenants describe a quiet complex but report serious problems: maintenance requests ignored or delayed for months, unresponsive leasing staff, mold, pests, and one account of armed robbery on site. Rents have risen notably over time, though some found older rates closer to $500/month.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Aston has sustained severe management and maintenance failures across years. Laundry and plumbing remain broken with no fixes. Office is unstaffed and inaccessible by phone, management ignores repair requests and withholds deposits. Rent payment system malfunctions and imposes extra charges.
Review evidence is minimal (one substantive account from five years ago). That reviewer reported widespread roaches, non-responsive owners, broken cameras in the garage, frequent car break-ins, delayed repairs, and security failures. The single voice cannot represent current conditions reliably.
Five one-star reviews over six years paint a consistent picture of neglected maintenance, staff indifference, and mismanagement. Residents report work orders closed prematurely, AC failures going unrepaired, mold, missing packages, and near-total unresponsiveness from Dallas management, with no positive experiences noted.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Pebbles Park has provided housing and support services that changed residents' lives, particularly for families in transition. However, past complaints about pest control, management rudeness, and strict policies suggest the experience depends heavily on timing and circumstances.
Two strong opinions dominate a thin review set. One resident calls it excellent; another reports uncleanliness, violence, and deposit disputes. Limited evidence makes it hard to know which reflects current conditions. Request recent community feedback before deciding.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
One reviewer reports severe maintenance issues: a resident fell ill twice within months, with mold developing on belongings. The reviewer attributes this to poor unit condition and lack of transparency about interior photos.
Telstar Apartments in Oak Cliff has a deeply divided track record. While a few residents praise quick maintenance responses, the overwhelming majority report a toxic living environment marked by an aggressive manager, chronic water damage and black mold, pest infestations, missing fire safety equipment, and documented discrimination. Multiple residents filed complaints with the city of Dallas and BBB. With 53% of reviews one or two stars against a category average of 3.79, this complex appears significantly worse than typical luxury high-rise competitors.
Limited review evidence across seven years. One resident cited broken AC and heat, outdated window units, and unprofessional management (MacLamar Management), describing it as overpriced despite attractive grounds. Another gave a brief five-star rating without detail.
All three reviews rate the property one or two stars. Residents report a broken water heater causing apartment flooding with no response from emergency maintenance or the office over multiple days. Others cite persistent noise from neighbors, thin walls, and safety issues including drug activity and domestic disturbances.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Review evidence is limited for this property. The business offers furnished units from studios to 2+ bedrooms in Vickery Meadow, with amenities including a resort pool, 24/7 concierge, co-working space, and in-unit washer/dryer.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
The property offers generous floor plans, but reviewers flag neglected maintenance and a worn appearance. With only 8 Google reviews averaging 2.8 stars (50% one/two-star ratings), evidence is limited. The mix of spacious interiors against visible disrepair suggests inconsistent property upkeep.
Review evidence is limited for this business. Their website lists heart healing, spiritual abuse recovery, and grief coaching services in Oak Cliff and Casa View, with online options available. Pricing starts at $99 for online coaching.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
No individual reviews available to assess resident experience or satisfaction. The property claims premium amenities including smart home technology, pool, fitness center, dog park, and EV charging in a walkable Uptown location near Klyde Warren Park and the Arts District.
Review evidence for Belleview Apartments is limited. The business offers one to three-bedroom units with on-site management and maintenance in the Cedars neighborhood near downtown Dallas.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Last updated 2026-09-16